Prince Harry, Sir Elton John, and Elizabeth Hurley are among a group of high-profile figures who have filed applications to challenge a High Court ruling that dismissed their privacy case against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.
The group, which also includes Sir Elton's husband David Furnish, actress Sadie Frost, and campaigner Baroness Lawrence, lost the case in July after an 11-week trial. They had alleged unlawful information gathering by ANL, but Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed all claims, describing the evidence as insufficient. The publisher had strongly denied the allegations, calling the judgment an "overwhelming victory for the Daily Mail and its journalists."
In August, the judge ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs, a rare move that could see them liable for up to £34.5 million in legal fees. They were also instructed to make an initial payment of £9.54 million. The group's spokesperson said they "respectfully disagree" with the decisions, which they consider "legally and factually flawed."
The applications for permission to appeal were filed with the Court of Appeal on Friday. The statement did not mention Liberal Democrat politician Sir Simon Hughes, who was also part of the original action. The BBC has contacted him to confirm whether he will join the appeal.
During the trial, Prince Harry testified in person, claiming that 14 articles about him "plainly" proved that journalists had listened to his phone calls. However, the judge ruled that he had failed to prove this. The trial also saw current and former Mail journalists deny any illegal activity, with lawyers for the publisher arguing that the articles were based on legitimate sourcing, including information from friends and social circles.
The appeal comes amid ongoing scrutiny of press practices and privacy rights. If successful, it could have significant implications for how such cases are handled and the financial risks involved for claimants.
Background
The case is one of several legal battles Prince Harry has pursued against the British tabloid press. He has been a vocal critic of media intrusion, citing the treatment of his mother, Princess Diana. The Mail publisher has consistently denied wrongdoing and defended its journalism.
The Court of Appeal will now decide whether to grant permission to appeal. If granted, the case would be heard by senior judges, potentially leading to a landmark ruling on privacy and costs.
